Studi Eksperimen Skala Laboratorium Respons Distribusi Beda Potensial Metode Mise a la Masse pada Model Sungai Bawah Tanah

Authors

  • Roma Widiyansari Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29303/goescienceed.v7i4.3147

Keywords:

Geoelectrical Method, Mise a la Masse, Underground River, Electrical Potential Difference Distribution

Abstract

Laboratory-scale experiments were conducted to investigate the response of electrical potential difference distribution to conductive-body geometry using the Mise à la Masse (MALM) method. Characterizing subsurface conductive pathways is important for understanding groundwater systems, particularly in areas where underground rivers may serve as water resources. However, the heterogeneous nature of natural subsurface conditions requires controlled laboratory experiments to understand the basic MALM response. Two conductor geometries, straight and two-branch models, were tested in relatively homogeneous dry and wet sand media. Potential differences were measured at observation points around the models and visualized as contour maps. The results show distinct potential distribution patterns associated with medium conditions and conductor geometry. Wet-sand models produced more continuous and relatively smoother potential distributions, making the conductive-body geometry more readily recognizable than in dry sand. The two-branch conductor generated a more complex potential pattern than the straight conductor, indicating that conductor geometry influences the surrounding potential field. These results demonstrate the capability of MALM to characterize conductive-body responses under controlled laboratory conditions and its potential for delineating underground river pathways. Further experiments using heterogeneous media and more realistic subsurface conditions are needed to evaluate its field applicability.

References

Chen, Y., Dong, W., Ren, H., & Li, X. (2023). Mise-a-la-masse method, tracer tests and cave detection analysis of underground-river karst-conduit distribution and structure: A case study of the Dafengdong conduits in Guizhou Province, China. Hydrogeology Journal, 31(3), 589–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-023-02609-6

Gan, F., Han, K., Lan, F., Chen, Y., & Zhang, W. (2017). Multi-geophysical approaches to detect karst channels underground—A case study in Mengzi of Yunnan Province, China. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 136, 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2016.10.036

Gupta, D. (2007). Mise-a-la-masse—A cost effective method in mineral exploration. Journal of the Geological Society of India, 69.

Ling, C., Revil, A., Qi, Y., Abdulsamad, F., Shi, P., Nicaise, S., & Peyras, L. (2019). Application of the Mise-à-la-Masse method to detect the bottom leakage of water reservoirs. Engineering Geology, 261, 105272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105272

Mary, B., Peruzzo, L., Boaga, J., Schmutz, M., Wu, Y., Hubbard, S. S., & Cassiani, G. (2018). Small-scale characterization of vine plant root water uptake via 3-D electrical resistivity tomography and mise-à-la-masse method. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 22(10), 5427–5444. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5427-2018

Mary, B., Peruzzo, L., Wu, Y., & Cassiani, G. (2022). Advanced Potential Field Analysis Applied to Mise‐à‐la‐Masse Surveys for Leakage Detection. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 127(11), e2022JB024747. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JB024747

Mu’in, F., Alfiansyah, D., Udin, Y., Anendito, A., Yuliantoro, P., Buditama, A., Pratiwi, M., Hartantyo, E., Marwan Irnaka, T., Suroso, T., Wibowo, N., Yulisasongko, M., & Suwardi, B. (2024). Labscale Experiment Fluid Injection Using Self Potential, Electrical Resistivity Tomography, and Mise-à-la-Masse. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202471067

Mustopa, E., Suhanto, E., Srigutomo, W., & Sutarno, D. (2016). Resistivity Imaging of Mataloko Geothermal Field By Mise-Á-La-Masse Method. Indonesian Journal of Physics, 22. https://doi.org/10.5614/itb.ijp.2011.22.2.3

Pant, S. R. (2004). Tracing Groundwater Flow by Mise-à-la-masse Measurement of Injected Saltwater. Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics, 9(3), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.4133/JEEG9.3.155

PARASNIS, D. (2006). Three-dimensional electric mise-à-la-masse survey of an irregular lead-zinc-copper deposit in central Sweden. Geophysical Prospecting, 15, 407–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1967.tb01796.x

Perri, M. T., De Vita, P., Masciale, R., Portoghese, I., Chirico, G. B., & Cassiani, G. (2018). Time-lapse Mise-á-la-Masse measurements and modeling for tracer test monitoring in a shallow aquifer. Journal of Hydrology, 561, 461–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.11.013

Perrin, R., Dickson, K., & Dawson, J. (2019). Delineation of a conductive aquifer using mise-a-la-masse with a modified acquisition geometry. In Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2019 (pp. 108–111). Society of Exploration Geophysicists and Environment and Engineering Geophysical Society. https://doi.org/10.4133/sageep.32-027

Singh, L. N., & Banglani, S. (2009). Mise-a-la-masse survey-An useful tool in tracing polymetallic sulphide mineralisation in Biranthiya Khurd area, Pali district, Rajasthan. Indian Minerals, 63, 389–396.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-19

How to Cite

Widiyansari, R. (2026). Studi Eksperimen Skala Laboratorium Respons Distribusi Beda Potensial Metode Mise a la Masse pada Model Sungai Bawah Tanah. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains, Geologi, Dan Geofisika (GeoScienceEd Journal), 7(4), 5518–5525. https://doi.org/10.29303/goescienceed.v7i4.3147