Analisis Bahaya Gempa Bumi Menggunakan Metode Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis (PSHA): Studi Kasus Provinsi Bengkulu

Authors

  • Muhammad Abdul Aziz Sekolah Tinggi Meteorologi Klimatologi dan Geofisika (STMKG)
  • Muzli Muzli Sekolah Tinggi Meteorologi Klimatologi dan Geofisika (STMKG) https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1425-7256
  • Oriza Sativa Badan Meteorologi Klimatologi dan Geofisika (BMKG)
  • Aditya Setyo Rahman Badan Meteorologi Klimatologi dan Geofisika (BMKG)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29303/goescienceed.v7i4.3106

Keywords:

Bengkulu Province, Deaggregation, Peak Ground Acceleration, PSHA, Sumatra Fault.

Abstract

Bengkulu Province is located in an active tectonic zone along the western coast of Sumatra, influenced by the Sumatra Megathrust subduction zone and the Great Sumatra Fault, making it highly susceptible to damaging earthquakes. Earthquake hazard in Bengkulu Province has not been assessed province-wide, as previous studies covered only Bengkulu City and the national hazard map presents bedrock values. The M 6.0 earthquake of 23 May 2025, which damaged dozens of houses in Bengkulu City, underscores the need for a surface-level assessment. This study aims to analyze the seismic hazard level in Bengkulu Province using the Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis (PSHA) method and deaggregation analysis to identify dominant earthquake sources. The data used include earthquake catalogs from 1906–2024 provided by USGS and BMKG within a 500 km radius of the study area, as well as Vs30 data to account for local site effects. PSHA calculations were conducted for two exceedance probability scenarios: 10% in 50 years (return period of 475 years) and 2% in 50 years (return period of 2,475 years). The results show that surface Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) values range from 0.39–1.45 g for the 475-year return period and 0.60–1.94 g for the 2,475-year return period, with the highest values concentrated along the Musi–Ketaun segment of the Great Sumatra Fault. Deaggregation results indicate that short return-period hazards have a dominant contribution from nearby active faults (≈15 km, Mw 6.6), while long return-period PGA contributions shift to distant megathrust sources (≈65 km, Mw 8.6). These findings provide crucial information for earthquake-resistant building design and disaster mitigation planning in Bengkulu Province.

References

Aki, K. (1965). Maximum likelihood estimate of b in the formula log N = a – bM and its confidence limits. Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute, 43, 237–239.

Badan Standardisasi Nasional. (2019). SNI 1726:2019: Tata cara perencanaan ketahanan gempa untuk struktur bangunan gedung dan nongedung. https://www.bsn.go.id

BMKG. (2025). Ulasan guncangan tanah akibat gempa Bengkulu 23 Mei 2025. https://www.bmkg.go.id/gempabumi/ulasan-guncangan-tanah/ulasan-guncangan-tanah-akibat-gempa-bengkulu-23-mei-2025

Gardner, J. K., & Knopoff, L. (1974). Is the sequence of earthquakes in Southern California, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian? Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 64(5), 1363–1367. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0640051363

Konca, A. O., Avouac, J. P., Sladen, A., Meltzner, A. J., Sieh, K., Fang, P., Li, Z., Galetzka, J., Genrich, J., Chlieh, M., Natawidjaja, D. H., Bock, Y., Fielding, E. J., Ji, C., & Helmberger, D. V. (2008). Partial rupture of a locked patch of the Sumatra megathrust during the 2007 earthquake sequence. Nature, 456(7222), 631–635. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07572

Litman, Yuwana, & Caniago, Z. B. (2021). Analisis probabilitas bahaya kegempaan untuk pengelolaan daerah dalam mitigasi bencana gempa bumi di Kota Bengkulu. Naturalis – Jurnal Penelitian Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam dan Lingkungan, 10(1), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.31186/naturalis.10.1.18161

Mase, L. Z., Sugianto, N., & Refrizon. (2021). Seismic hazard microzonation of Bengkulu City, Indonesia. Geoenvironmental Disasters, 8(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-021-00178-y

McCaffrey, R. (2009). The Tectonic Framework of the Sumatran Subduction Zone. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 37, 345–366. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.031208.100212

McGuire, R. K. (2004). Seismic hazard and risk analysis. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.

PuSGeN. (2024). Peta sumber dan bahaya gempa Indonesia tahun 2024.

Scordilis, E. M. (2006). Empirical global relations converting MS and mb to moment magnitude. Journal of Seismology, 10(2), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-006-9012-4

Sieh, K., & Natawidjaja, D. (2000). Neotectonics of the Sumatran fault, Indonesia. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 105(B12), 28295–28326. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jb900120

Wiemer, S. (2001). A software package to analyze seismicity: ZMAP. Seismological Research Letters, 72(3), 373–382. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.72.3.373

Downloads

Published

2026-09-26

How to Cite

Aziz, M. A., Muzli, M., Sativa, O., & Rahman, A. S. (2026). Analisis Bahaya Gempa Bumi Menggunakan Metode Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis (PSHA): Studi Kasus Provinsi Bengkulu. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains, Geologi, Dan Geofisika (GeoScienceEd Journal), 7(4), 5836–5845. https://doi.org/10.29303/goescienceed.v7i4.3106