Efektivitas Discovery Learning Terintegrasi Kearifan Lokal Genteng Karang Penang terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa pada Materi Suhu dan Kalor

Authors

  • Badrut Tamam Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Suyatno Sutoyo Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Dian Novita Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Beni Setiawan Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Utama Alan Deta Universitas Negeri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29303/goescienceed.v7i3.2194

Keywords:

Discovery Learning, Ethnoscience, Karang Penang Local Wisdom, Critical Thinking, Temperature and Heat.

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of Discovery Learning integrated with Karang Penang brick making local wisdom in improving junior high school students' critical thinking skills on temperature and heat topics. This pre-experimental study used a one group pretest posttest design involving 27 students. Data were collected through a validated critical thinking skills test, learning implementation observation sheets, and student response questionnaires, then analyzed using N-Gain and Wilcoxon Signed Rank Tests. The results showed that learning implementation was excellent (83,33%) and student responses were highly positive (89.72%). The improvement in students' critical thinking skills was in the medium category with an N-Gain score of 0.5602. This indicates that developing a Discovery Learning based instructional tool integrated with Karang Penang local wisdom provides a positive contribution to improving students' critical thinking skills. The Wilcoxon test indicated a significant difference between pretest and posttest scores (p < 0.05). In conclusion, implementing Discovery Learning integrated with Karang Penang local wisdom effectively improves students' critical thinking skills.

References

Adhiyah, M. (2023). Pembelajaran konstruktivisme berbantuan media benda konkret untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa pada materi bangun ruang di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 7(4), 2075–2081.https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v7i4.4988.

Aikenhead, G. S., & Ogawa, M. (2007). Indigenous knowledge and science revisited. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2(3), 539–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-007-9067-8

Alfieri, L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2011). Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021017

Ali, L. U., Suranto, S., & Indrowati, M. (2025).Exploring ethnoscience in science education: A systematic literature review from 2020–2025. Konstan: Jurnal Fisika dan Pendidikan Fisika, 10(1).https://doi.org/10.20414/konstan.v10i01.692

Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31(1), 21–32.

Cahyani, V. P., & Fadly, D. (2024). Local wisdom in chemistry learning: A literature review on the ethnoscience approach. Jurnal Studi Guru dan Pembelajaran, 7(3), 1262–1274.https://doi.org/10.30605/jsgp.7.3.2024.4801

Cahyaningtyas, C. D., Fatma, E., Rianto, P. A. M., Nuha, U., Wahyuni, S., & Yusmar, F. (2023). Misconception analysis of junior high school students on the material of temperature and heat concepts. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan.https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8200897.

Febrian, A. ., Wilujeng, I. ., & Kun Prasetyo, Z. (2024). Literature Review: Development of Science Learning Based on Local Wisdom and Indigenous Knowledge for ESD. KnE Social Sciences, 9(13), 704–716. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i13.15989

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement Versus Traditional Methods: A Six-Thousand-Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory PhysicsCourses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809.

Hendryadi, H. (2017). Validitas isi: Tahap awal pengembangan kuesioner. Jurnal Riset Manajemen dan Bisnis (JRMB) Fakultas Ekonomi UNIAT, 2(2), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.36226/jrmb.v2i2.47.

Kurniawati, E., Oktradiksa, A., & Sholkihah, N. D. (2021). Discovery learning model for improving the students’ critical thinking skills: A narrative review. Al-Bidayah: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Islam, 13(2), 345-366. doi.org

Murniati, Kune, S., & Sukmawati. (2025). The effect of the discovery learning model on critical thinking skills and science learning outcomes. Electronic Journal of Education, Social Economics and Technology, 6(1), 544–548. https://doi.org/10.33122/ejeset.v6i1.569

Nabil, N. R., Wulandari, I., Yamtinah, S., Ariani, S. R. D., & Ulfa, M. (2022). Analisis indeks Aiken untuk mengetahui validitas isi instrumen Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum berbasis konteks sains kimia. Paedagogia: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/paedagogia.v25i2.64566

Nursakinah, S., & Suyanta, S. (2023). Influence of Models Discovery Learning to Critical Thinking Ability and Scientific Attitude of Students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(10), 8879–8889. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.4792

OECD (2024). PISA 2022 results (Volume III): Creative minds, creative schools. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/765ee8c2-en.

Prasasty, A. T., Handayani, Y., & Suharyati, H. (2025).Pendekatan konstruktivisme: Meningkatkan hasil belajar melalui pembelajaran aktif di sekolah. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(2), 2048–2054. https Radhakrishna, R. B. (2007). Tips for developing and testing questionnaires/instruments. Journal of Extension, 45(1). https://www.joe.org/joe/2007february/tt2.php.://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v8i2.7091.

Richardson, J. C., Caskurlu, S., Castellanos-Reyes, D., Duan, S., & Duha, M. S. U. (2022).

Instructors’ conceptualization and implementation of scaffolding in online higher education courses. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 34, 242–279.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-021-09300-3.

Riduwan. (2018). Skala pengukuran variabel-variabel penelitian (Cetakan ke-12). Alfabeta.

Sihombing, R. A., Anwar, S., Liu, S.-Y., Muslim, M., Winarno, N., & Sihombing, P. J. (2025). Integrating local wisdom into environmental education: A systematic review of ethnoscience research in Indonesia. Journal of Natural Science and Integration, 8(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.24014/jnsi.v8i1.35762

Stemler, S. E. (2004). A comparison of consensus, consistency, and measurement approaches to interrater reliability. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.7275/96jp-xz07.

Syafitri, M., Syaira, A., Julianis, J., & Saputra, M. A. N. (2023).Upaya meningkatkan pemahaman konsep belajar siswa dengan model pembelajaran discovery learning. Journal of Education Research, 4(3), 1577–1580.https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v4i3.290

Utami, L., Festiyed, F., Ilahi, D. P., Ratih, A., Lazulva, L., & Yenti, E. (2024). Analisis Indeks Aiken untuk mengetahui validitas isi instrumen Scientific Habits of Mind. Journal of Research and Education Chemistry (JREC), 6(1), 59-67. https://doi.org/10.25299/jrec.2024.vol6(1).17430

Yanti, F. A., & Thohir, M. A. (2024).Higher-order thinking skills in science learning: A systematic review from 2014–2023. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 13(4), 2419–2427.https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i4.28082.

Yeo, S., & Zadnik, M. (2001). Introductory thermal concept evaluation: Assessing students’ understanding. Physics Education, 36(6), 496–504. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/36/6/305.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-22

How to Cite

Tamam, B., Sutoyo, S., Novita, D., Setiawan, B., & Deta, U. A. (2026). Efektivitas Discovery Learning Terintegrasi Kearifan Lokal Genteng Karang Penang terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa pada Materi Suhu dan Kalor. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains, Geologi, Dan Geofisika (GeoScienceEd Journal), 7(3), 2648–2656. https://doi.org/10.29303/goescienceed.v7i3.2194