Profil Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA pada Materi Usaha dan Energi: Analisis Berdasarkan Indikator Facione
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29303/goescienceed.v7i2.1929Keywords:
Critical Thinking Skills, Facione Indicators, Work And Energy, Physics Learning, Student Ability Profile.Abstract
This study aims to describe the profile of high school students’ critical thinking skills on the topic of work and energy based on Peter A. Facione’s critical thinking indicators. The research employed a quantitative approach with a descriptive method. The sample consisted of 52 tenth-grade students of SMA Al-Ma’soem in the 2024/2025 academic year, selected using purposive sampling techniques. The research instrument was an essay test developed based on six Facione indicators, namely interpretation, analysis, evaluation, inference, explanation, and self-regulation. Data were analyzed using quantitative descriptive techniques through percentage calculations for each indicator achievement. The results showed that students’ critical thinking skills were categorized as high. The evaluation indicator obtained the highest percentage at 70.41%, while the explanation indicator achieved the lowest percentage at 66.12%. The low achievement in the explanation indicator indicates that students still experience difficulties in constructing scientific arguments systematically. This study demonstrates that physics learning on the topic of work and energy is capable of developing students’ critical thinking skills, although explanation skills still need improvement.
References
Badriyah, L., & Mubarok, H. (2021). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa pada pembelajaran fisika berbasis argumentasi ilmiah. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 17(2), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v17i2.30121
Darwis, R. H., & Patimbangi, A. (2024). Higher order thinking and critical thinking skills in problem-based learning environments: A systematic review. Journal of Learning and Development Studies, 4(1), 15–28. Retrieved from https://al-kindipublishers.org
Facione, P. A. (2015). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.insightassessment.com
Lubis, N. A., Erlangga, S. Y., & Yektyastuti, R. (2025). Exploring junior high school students’ critical thinking skills in physics learning problem solving: Evidence from work and energy. Compton: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 12(1), 33–41.
Marisda, D., Rahmawati, F., & Kurniawan, A. (2024). Profil keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa SMA pada pembelajaran fisika berbasis scientific reasoning. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(3), 1550–1560. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i3.5621
Muchsin, A., Vebrianto, R., & Al-Khairi, N. (2025). The effect of PBL e-modules on science literacy, critical thinking, and creativity. Waskita: Jurnal Pendidikan Nilai dan Pembangunan Karakter, 9(1), 45–56.
Solikah, A. A., Saputro, S., & Yamtinah, S. (2024). Research trends in group investigation learning model for critical thinking skills in science learning. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 10(1), 112–124. Retrieved from https://scholarhub.uny.ac.id
Susilawati, S., Doyan, A., Muliyadi, L., & Hakim, S. (2019). Growth of tin oxide thin film by aluminum and fluorine doping using spin coating Sol-Gel techniques. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 6(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v6i1.264
Taqwa, M. R. A., Sinaga, P., Suhendi, E., & Feranie, S. (2025). The role of learning technology in critical thinking skills: A bibliometric analysis of current trends and future research directions. Educational Process: International Journal, 14(1), 45–61
Zamzam, A., Mansor, R., & Mai, M. Y. M. (2026). The effect of using digital concept maps on developing critical thinking among grade 10 advanced students in physics. Journal of Language and Education, 8(2), 87–101.
Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2009). P21 framework definitions. Partnership for 21st Century Skills.
World Economic Forum. (2020). The future of jobs report 2020. World Economic Forum.
