Analisis Spasial Respon Situs Berdasarkan Vs30 USGS, Estimasi Amplifikasi dan Periode Dominan di Seram Bagian Timur
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29303/goescienceed.v7i2.1793Keywords:
Vs30, Empirical Amplification, Dominant Period, Seismic Response, Spatial AnalysisAbstract
This study focuses on Seram Bagian Timur, an area known for its complex geological setting and active tectonic. Recent seismic events, including the 26 September 2019 Ambon earthquake (Mw 6.5) and the 22 June 2025 earthquake near Bula (Mw 5.0), indicate the presence of active fault systems and heterogeneous subsurface conditions. These conditions govern how seismic waves are modified at the ground surface particularly variation in subsurface material properties. This effect is represented by the amplification factor, which estimated using the empirical relationship proposed by Fujimoto and Midorikawa. The objective of this study is to examine the spatial variability of site response using Vs30 data from USGS, along with amplification factors and dominant periods. The analysis is based on 6,550 grid points with a spatial resolution of approximately 930 m, supported by regional geological information. Data processing involved extraction, interpolation, and mapping, while amplification and dominant period were estimated using empirical approach The results indicate that Vs30 values range from 180 to 900 m/s (site classes BC–E), with lower values concentrated in coastal and eastern areas, and higher values predominantly found in the western part of the study area. Amplification factors vary between 0.77 and 2.79, generally falling within low to moderate categories. Meanwhile, dominant periods range from 0.133 to 0.667 seconds, representing soil types from hard to very soft conditions. Overall, the three parameters show a consistent pattern, where lower Vs30 values tend to correspond to higher amplification and longer dominant periods, reflecting less consolidated subsurface materials.
References
Alosman, S. O., Akin, M. K., & Çabalar, A. F. (2026). (2026). Seismic Site Classification via Vs30 and SPT-N Values in Antakya City, Türkiye. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 1–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2025.2612498
Badan Geologi. (2025). Analisis geologi kejadian gempa bumi di barat daya Bula, Seram Timur, Maluku, 22 Juni 2025. Retrievered from https://geologi.esdm.go.id/media-center/analisis-geologi-kejadian-gempa-bumi-di-barat-daya-bula-seram-timur-maluku-22-juni-2025
Cipta, Athanasius. (2025). Generating Indonesian-wide Vs30 Map Using Engineering Geomorphology Approach. Indonesian Journal on Geoscience. 12. doi: https://doi.org/10.17014/ijog.12.2.217-229
Dobry, R., Borcherdt, R. D., Crouse, C. B., Idriss, I. M., Joyner, W. B., Martin, G. R., Power, M. S., Rinne, E. E., & Seed, R. B. (2000). New site coefficients and site classification system used in recent building seismic code provisions. Earthquake Spectra, 16(1), 41–67. doi: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586082
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2020). NEHRP recommended seismic provisions for new buildings and other structures (FEMA P-2082). Washington, DC: FEMA.
Fujimoto, K., & Midorikawa, S. (2006). Relationship between average shear-wave velocity and site amplification inferred from strong motion records at nearby station pairs. Journal of Japan Association for Earthquake Engineering, 6(1), 11–22. doi: https://doi.org/10.5610/jaee.6.11
Gironelli, V., Volatili, T., Luzi, L., Brunelli, G., & Tondi, E. (2024). Dual-proxy estimation of Vs30: the case study of the Marche Region (central Italy). Journal of Maps, 20(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2024.2349787
Hadi, A. I., Refrizon, R., Halauddin, H., Lidjawati, L., & Edo, P. (2021). Interpretasi tingkat kekerasan batuan bawah permukaan di daerah rawan gempa bumi Kota Bengkulu. Indonesian Journal of Applied Physics, 11(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.20961/ijap.v11i1.46525
Kanai, K. (1983). Seismology in Engineering. Tokyo University. Japan
Kumar, A., Ghosh, G. Assessment of soil amplification effects on the seismic vulnerability of irregular reinforced concrete buildings of varying heights. Sci Rep 15, 34057 (2025). doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-14145-2
Magistrale, H., Rong, Y., Silva, W., & Thompson, E. (2012). A site response map of the continental US. In Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (15th WCEE), Lisbon – Portugal. doi: https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1679.6161
Nakamura, Y. (1989) A Method for Dynamic Characteristics Estimation of the Subsurface Using Microtremor on the Ground Surface. Quarterly Report of RTRI, 30, 25-33.
Nugraha, A., Muttay, F., Ry, R., Supendi, P., Rosalia, S., Sahara, D., Baskara, A., Muhari, A., Priyono, A., Zulfakriza, Z., Widiyantoro, S., Puspito, N., & Elly, E. (2026). Seismic velocity structure beneath the source region of the 2019 Ambon earthquake (Mw 6.5), Indonesia, from local earthquake tomography. Earth Planets Space (2026). doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-026-02391-1
Ratman, N., Atmawinata, S. (1994). Peta Geologi Indonesia, Lembar Ambon, skala 1:1.000.000.
Rosset, P., Elrawy, A., Nadarajah, S., & Chouinard, L. (2025). Vs30 Derived from Geology: An Attempt in the Province of Quebec, Canada. Geotechnics, 5(2), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/geotechnics5020024
Sahara, D. P., Nugraha, A. D., Muhari, A., Rusdin, A. A., Rosalia, S., Priyono, A., Zulfakri, Z., Widiyantoro, S., Puspito, N. T., Rietbrock, A., Lesmana, A., Kusumawati, D., Ardianto, A., Baskara, A. W., Halauwet, Y., Shiddiqi, H. A., Rafie, M. T., Pradisti, R., Mozef, P. W., Tuakia, M. Z., & Elly, E. (2021). Source mechanism and triggered large aftershocks of the Mw 6.5 Ambon, Indonesia earthquake. Tectonophysics, 799, 228709. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2020.228709
Yulianto, G. F., Wakano, Q. S. S., Santoso, E. W., Ridwan, M., & Santoso, B. (2025). Preliminary study site characterization using HVSR microtremor in West Bandung Basin. E3S Web of Conferences, 604, 14001. doi: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202560414001




