Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Program Pelatihan Pembelajaran Mendalam (PM) bagi Guru SMPN 2 Praya Tengah Menggunakan Model Countenance Evaluation Stake

Authors

  • Nurul Hidayati Universitas Mataram
  • Abdul Kadir Jaelani Universitas Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29303/goescienceed.v7i1.1610

Keywords:

Program Evaluation, Deep Learning, Stake Model, Teacher Training, Junior High School.

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the implementation of the Deep Learning (Pembelajaran Mendalam/PM) training program for teachers at SMPN 2 Praya Tengah using the Stake evaluation model, which consists of antecedents, transactions, and outcomes. The study employed a qualitative approach, with data collected through interviews, observations, and documentation. The research subjects included five teachers participating in the training, the school principal, and the training instructor. The findings indicate that in the antecedents aspect, the Deep Learning training was conducted based on teachers’ real needs to improve the quality of more meaningful and student-centered learning. Institutional support was generally adequate, although limitations were found in facilities and funding. In the transactions aspect, the training process was participatory and collaborative, utilizing various methods such as discussions, simulations, and hands-on practice that encouraged active teacher engagement, despite challenges related to time management and depth of material coverage. In the outcomes aspect, the training had a positive impact on improving teachers’ understanding, self-confidence, and skills in designing and implementing deep learning in the classroom; however, implementation still faced constraints related to limited time and students’ readiness. Based on these results, it can be concluded that the Deep Learning (PM) training for teachers at SMPN 2 Praya Tengah is effective and relevant to school needs, yet it requires continuous support and follow-up mentoring to ensure its impact contributes optimally to improving the quality of learning.

References

Alkin, M. C., & Vo, A. T. (2022). Evaluation roots: An international perspective. Sage Publications.

Avalos, B., & De los Ríos, D. (2020). Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 95.

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2).

Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2021). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines. Pearson Education.

Fullan, M., Quinn, J., & McEachen, J. (2020). Deep learning: Engage the world, change the world. Corwin Press.

Hattie, J. (2021). Visible learning: The sequel. Routledge.

OECD. (2020). Education 2030: The future of education and skills. OECD Publishing.

Timperley, H. (2021). Leading professional learning: Practical strategies for impact in schools. ACER Press.

Alkin, M. C., & Vo, A. T. (2022). Evaluation roots: An international perspective. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2021). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2021). Doing interviews (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Stake, R. E. (2020). Qualitative research: Studying how things work. New York: Guilford Press.

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140.

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2020). Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.

Fullan, M., Quinn, J., Drummy, M., & Gardner, M. (2020). Education reimagined: The future of learning. New Pedagogies for Deep Learning.

Hattie, J. (2021). Visible learning: The sequel. London: Routledge.

Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Panduan pembelajaran dan asesmen Kurikulum Merdeka. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.

Kemendikbudristek. (2023). Penguatan pembelajaran mendalam dalam implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka. Jakarta: Kemdikbudristek.

Korthagen, F. A. J. (2020). Pedagogy of teacher education. Singapore: Springer.

OECD. (2021). Teachers as designers of learning environments. Paris: OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2023). Innovative learning environments and deep learning. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Patton, M. Q. (2021). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Stake, R. E. (2020). Program evaluation, particularly responsive evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 2020(165), 13–26.

Sugiyono. (2021). Metode penelitian kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Widoyoko, E. P. (2022). Evaluasi program pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Zohar, A., & Barzilai, S. (2021). A review of research on metacognition in science education. Studies in Science Education, 57(1), 1–36.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-21

How to Cite

Hidayati, N., & Jaelani, A. K. (2026). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Program Pelatihan Pembelajaran Mendalam (PM) bagi Guru SMPN 2 Praya Tengah Menggunakan Model Countenance Evaluation Stake. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains, Geologi, Dan Geofisika (GeoScienceEd Journal), 7(1), 446–450. https://doi.org/10.29303/goescienceed.v7i1.1610

Issue

Section

Articles