Pengaruh Model Discovery Learning Berbantuan Alat Praktikum Fluida Dinamis terhadap Penguasaan Konsep dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Peserta Didik

Authors

  • Armini Armini Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika, FKIP, Univeristas Mataram, Mataram, Indonesia.
  • Muhammad Taufik Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika, FKIP, Univeristas Mataram, Mataram, Indonesia.
  • Kosi, Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika, FKIP, Univeristas Mataram, Mataram, Indonesia.
  • Muhammad Zuhdi Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika, FKIP, Univeristas Mataram, Mataram, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29303/goescienceed.v6i4.1114

Keywords:

Discovery learning modelx, practicum, concept mastery, creative thinking skills.

Abstract

Concept mastery and creative thinking skills are essential competencies that students must possess to support effective problem-solving. This study aims to analyze the effect of the discovery learning model assisted by dynamic fluid practicum tools on concept mastery, creative thinking skills, and both simultaneously. The method employed was a quasi-experimental design using a non-equivalent control group design. The research sample consisted of two classes: class XI MIPA 1 as the experimental group and class XI MIPA 4 as the control group, selected through purposive sampling. The instrument for measuring concept mastery consisted of 10 multiple-choice questions, while creative thinking skills were assessed using 6 essay-type questions. Both instruments had been tested for validity, reliability, difficulty level, and discriminating power. Posttest data were analyzed using normality and homogeneity tests, followed by hypothesis testing using the t-test with pooled variance and MANOVA. The t-test results for concept mastery and creative thinking skills were 2.80 and 2.09, respectively, with a t-table value of 2.00 at a 5% significance level (0.05). These results indicate that tcount > ttable for both variables, meaning that H01 and H02 were rejected and Ha1 and Ha2 were accepted, demonstrating the effect of the discovery learning model assisted by practicum tools on both concept mastery and creative thinking skills. Furthermore, the MANOVA test yielded a significance value of 0.008 < 0.05, leading to the rejection of H03 and acceptance of Ha3, indicating a simultaneous effect of the discovery learning model assisted by practicum tools on concept mastery and creative thinking skills. Thus, the discovery learning model is effective in improving concept mastery, creative thinking skills, and both simultaneously.

References

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assesing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Florida, R., Mellander, C., & King, K. (2015). The global creativity index 2015. Martin Prosperity Institute.

Hanina, P., Faiz, A., & Yuningsih, D. (2021). Upaya Guru dalam Mengatasi Kejenuhan Belajar Peserta Didik di Masa Pandemi. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(5), 3791-3798. 10.31004/basicedu.v5i5.1402

Hepi, H., Karyanto, P., & Sukarmin. (2022). Hubungan Antara Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Materi Gerak Dan Gaya Dengan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Smp Kelas VIII Smp Negeri 1 Kebakkramat. INKUIRI: Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 11(1), 22-28. https://doi.org/10.20961/inkuiri.v11i1.54919

Hosnas, M. (2014). Pendekatan Scientific dan Kontekstual dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Husnaini, D., Darmaji, D., & Kurniawan, D. A. (2025). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Melalui Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning pada Materi Usaha, Energi dan Pesawat Sederhana di Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 22 Kota Jambi. JIIP-Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(4), 4129-4133. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v8i4.7637

Juniarso, T. (2020). Model discovery learning terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif mahasiswa. ELSE (Elementary School Education Journal): Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Sekolah Dasar, 4(1), 36-43. https://doi.org/10.30651/else.v4i1.4197

Junita, O., & Mahdi, N. H. (2024). Eksperimen dan Demonstrasi Alat Praktikum Fisika Sederhana, Abdimas Mandalika, 3(2), 50-54. https://doi.org/10.31764/justek.vXiY.ZZZ

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Badan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan dan Penjaminan Mutu. (2013). Pendidikan tentang Model Pembelajaran Penemuan (Discovery Learning). Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2016). Permendikbud Nomor 22 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Proses.

Khairina, A. D., Budyartati, S., & Samsiyah, N. (2022). Pengaruh Model Discovery Learning Berbantuan Media Audiovisual Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Tema 5 Muatan IPA Kelas V SD 02 Mojorejo Kota Madiun. Prosiding Konferensi Ilmiah Dasar, 3, 363-370. https://prosiding.unipma.ac.id/index.php/KID/article/viewFile/2753/2109

Kurniawati, D., Muhlis., & Makhrus. (2020). Validitas Multimedia Interaktif Berbasis Indikator Penguasaan Konsep Dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Pada Materi Kemagnetan. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, (15), 528-532. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v15i5.2112

Munandar, U. (2009). Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational Assessment of Students (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

Pravitasari, N. (2020). Pengaruh Partisipasi Aktif Orangtua Dan Panguasaan Konsep Kognitif Matematika Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa. Jurnal Studi Guru Dan Pembelajaran, 3(2), 206-211. https://doi.org/10.30605/jsgp.3.2.2020.308

Putri, R. (2020). Efektifitas Pembelajaran Berbasis Inquiry Untuk Meningkatkan Penguasaan Konsep Dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Mahasiswa Farmasi Pada Mata Kuliah Anatomi Fisiologi Manusia. Jurnal Biolokus, 3(2), 298-304. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/386220075.pdf

Ramadhan, I., & Warneri, W. (2023). Migrasi Kurikulum: Kurikulum 2013 Menuju Kurikulum Merdeka pada SMA Swasta Kapuas Pontianak. EDUKATIF: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(2), 741-750.

Rosmiati, R., Hikmawati., & Harjono, A. (2020). Pengaruh Model Discovery Learning Terhadap Penguasaan Konsep Fisika Peserta Didik Kelas XI MAN 1 Lombok Barat. Jurnal Ilmiah Propesi Pendidikan, 5(1), 238-240. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v5i1.100

Setuju, Triyono, B., Muhtadi, A., & Widowati, A. (2022). Mobile application smartphone: does it improve the 21st century’s competence of vocational school students?. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 12(12), 1286–1290. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.12.1752

Setyawan, R. A., & Kristanti, H. S. (2021). Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Pada Pembelajaran IPA Melalui Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning Bagi Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(2), 1076-108. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i2.877

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendidikan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Thoha, M. (2001). Pengembangan Soal Uraian dalam Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Turrahmah, M., Susilawati., & Makhrus, M. (2019). Pengaruh Model Discovery Learning Berbantuan Alat Praktikum Usaha dan Energi Terhadap Penguasaan Konsep Fisika Peserta Didik. Jurnal Pijar MIPA, 14(3), 118-122. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v14i3.1329

Nurhidayatullael, N., Zuhdi, M., Harjono, A., & Taufik, M. (2025). Pengaruh Model Discovery Learning Terhadap Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Fisika Peserta Didik. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains, Geologi, dan Geofisika (GeoScienceEd Journal), 6(2), 1067-1071. https://doi.org/10.29303/Goescienceed.v6i2.674

Rasidin, A., Baidowi, B., & Suuntoko, I. (2025). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas VIII B SMPN 1 Mataram Tahun Ajaran 2023/2024. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains, Geologi, dan Geofisika (GeoScienceEd Journal), 6(2), 842-848. https://doi.org/10.29303/Goescienceed.v6i2.768

Downloads

Published

2025-11-18

How to Cite

Armini, A., Taufik, M., Kosi, & Zuhdi, M. (2025). Pengaruh Model Discovery Learning Berbantuan Alat Praktikum Fluida Dinamis terhadap Penguasaan Konsep dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Peserta Didik. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains, Geologi, Dan Geofisika (GeoScienceEd Journal), 6(4), 1853–1861. https://doi.org/10.29303/goescienceed.v6i4.1114

Issue

Section

Articles